Can W.Va. Learn from Scottish Independence Movement?

Date Written by Jason Keeling on September 17, 2014

In the Eighteenth Century numerous Scots sailed from the Old World and emigrated toward the promise of a life with new opportunities. Many of them settled throughout the native lands of what is now West Virginia.

Remnants of this ancestry endure throughout the state. Bridgeport hosts a Scottish Festival annually, the town of Glasgow replicates the namesake of Scotland’s largest city, and West Virginia University has adopted a form of plaid officially approved by the Scottish Register of Tartans in Edinburgh.

While this heritage is acknowledged from a nostalgic perspective, perhaps greater attention should be focused on modern day Scotland, for we may glean insight from its most pressing challenge and find inspiration to consider more progressive thinking at home.

Scotland spurred cultural Enlightenment in the 1700s and it now seeks to construct a contemporary transformation. On Sept. 18 its citizens will vote on the following referendum: “Should Scotland be an independent country?”

That nation’s political leadership is heading the charge to gain independence from the United Kingdom it has belonged to for over 300 years.

A significant amount of decisions affecting Scotland are presently made in chambers of the UK Parliament, in London.

Yet only nine percent of that body’s House of Commons are composed of representatives from Scotland and the House of Lords are unelected. So issues of taxation, infrastructure, and economy are predominately made by officials outside their country.

This system of government has been in place longer than our state has existed; but the Scottish people now have the opportunity to move in a new direction.

Leadership and courage are the factors that have enabled such a choice.

It is not a sword-yielding Braveheart William Wallace advancing this historical moment, but the tenacity of political leaders, First Minister Alex Salmond and the Scottish National Party (SNP), who have worked to produce a series of actions setting this stage, despite a myriad of criticisms outlining challenges that could face an independent Scotland.

There are many nuances to leadership, but the ability to foresee future needs and expedite modernization in the public interest is critical. This requires going beyond the status quo and instead cultivating a willingness to think and work differently.

Over the last year polling has indicated the independence measure had little chance of passing, but in recent weeks an upsurge in support suggests a dead heat between those favoring a new direction and others opposed to this significant adjustment.

Whether the Scottish referendum passes, the needle has obviously been moved, and its people may feel emboldened to press on in numerous ways that benefit the greater good.

As Americans, perhaps we should ask ourselves if our current leaders are challenging us to move forward into a new age, whether at the federal or local level, and if not, let’s become more inclined to speak up about our own expectations for a better country and state, until the culture begins to shift toward one that takes more calculated risks.

- A similar version of this post first appeared in The Charleston Gazette on Sept. 14.

2 Responses to “Can W.Va. Learn from Scottish Independence Movement?”

  1. Travis said:

    This is especially interesting because Scotland will be seeing a huge decline in their natural resources starting around 2040. The impact will likely be reflectant of our own issue with coal towns in our state. The big difference is that they know this is going to happen and will hopefully institute other international resources or services in the following decades to counterbalance the effects.

  2. Archie McLachlan said:

    A radical change of the system of government in the UK is needed and the Scottish Referendum will be catalyst for that change. London and the south east of England draw in most of the money for infrastructure from the rest of the UK, while other areas in the country notably the north east have minimal funding.
    The Scottish Referendum is about achieving a government chosen by the people of Scotland and a fairer society for its people,with improvements to healthcare and welfare, while encouraging immigration and the set up of new businesses. The present Scottish Government spending powers are limited by the Westminster Government and this has been gradually reduced by current UK fiscal policy, with £25 Billion budget cuts after the next General Election forecast for all the UK.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>